User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-1506468-20190830091746: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1506468-20190827123101/@comment-1506468-20190830091746'''
As Niki says, this debate has nothing to do with the views of people who write/publish their work, in fact I don't know how we even got there.  
As Niki says, this debate has nothing to do with the views of people who write/publish their work, in fact I don't know how we even got there.  


Bringing us back on topic, do we have your agreement that these stories are valid, Amorkuz? It'd be nice to get this debate behind us and move on.
Bringing us back on topic, do we have your agreement that these stories are valid, Amorkuz? It'd be nice to get this debate behind us and move on.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190827123101-1506468/20190830091746-1506468]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:33, 27 April 2023

As Niki says, this debate has nothing to do with the views of people who write/publish their work, in fact I don't know how we even got there.

Bringing us back on topic, do we have your agreement that these stories are valid, Amorkuz? It'd be nice to get this debate behind us and move on.