User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1678571-20191107180006/@comment-38288735-20191114181816: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I mean, yes, five days is fast, but OP's point about it being equivalent to another story that was deemed worthy of inclusion is sound. If no one has anything more to add, I doubt they'll comment. | I mean, yes, five days is fast, but OP's point about it being equivalent to another story that was deemed worthy of inclusion is sound. If no one has anything more to add, I doubt they'll comment. | ||
I do have one question, though. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe ''The Dalek Conquests'' was made by the BBC, and ''The ArcHive Tapes'' were not. Do we know if they were explicitly licensed, or did they get by under the guise of nonfiction? I just want to make sure we're observing Rule 2. | I do have one question, though. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe ''The Dalek Conquests'' was made by the BBC, and ''The ArcHive Tapes'' were not. Do we know if they were explicitly licensed, or did they get by under the guise of nonfiction? I just want to make sure we're observing Rule 2. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191107180006-1678571/20191114181816-38288735]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:38, 27 April 2023
I mean, yes, five days is fast, but OP's point about it being equivalent to another story that was deemed worthy of inclusion is sound. If no one has anything more to add, I doubt they'll comment.
I do have one question, though. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe The Dalek Conquests was made by the BBC, and The ArcHive Tapes were not. Do we know if they were explicitly licensed, or did they get by under the guise of nonfiction? I just want to make sure we're observing Rule 2.
