User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1783865-20200325140803/@comment-1350697-20200326145548: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
First of all, do we '''know''' ''Message from the Doctor'' was just made by Whittaker, without, say, a script from Chris Chibnall? | First of all, do we '''know''' ''Message from the Doctor'' was just made by Whittaker, without, say, a script from Chris Chibnall? | ||
Second, regardless of exactly who it was made by, I think ''Message from the Doctor'' still pretty cleanly passes the four little rules? It's clearly narrative (rule 1), it was released by the BBC (rule 3) who, obviously, are the commercial license holders of everything seen and described (rule 2), and, frankly, I think you'd have a hard time finding anything substantial that says it's set outside the DWU. (rule 4) | Second, regardless of exactly who it was made by, I think ''Message from the Doctor'' still pretty cleanly passes the four little rules? It's clearly narrative (rule 1), it was released by the BBC (rule 3) who, obviously, are the commercial license holders of everything seen and described (rule 2), and, frankly, I think you'd have a hard time finding anything substantial that says it's set outside the DWU. (rule 4) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200325140803-1783865/20200326145548-1350697]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 13:42, 27 April 2023
First of all, do we know Message from the Doctor was just made by Whittaker, without, say, a script from Chris Chibnall?
Second, regardless of exactly who it was made by, I think Message from the Doctor still pretty cleanly passes the four little rules? It's clearly narrative (rule 1), it was released by the BBC (rule 3) who, obviously, are the commercial license holders of everything seen and described (rule 2), and, frankly, I think you'd have a hard time finding anything substantial that says it's set outside the DWU. (rule 4)