User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1827503-20150731042136/@comment-188432-20150731064205: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Audio Visuals are disallowed because they '''all''' do indeed fail [[four little rules|rule 2]]. Rule 2 disqualifications are easy to spot and non-controversial. There's no reason to wait for a ruling, as [[T:VS]] spells things out quite clearly. The only titles which spawn debate are those involving rule 4, but of course rule 4 inherently allows for such debates. | Audio Visuals are disallowed because they '''all''' do indeed fail [[four little rules|rule 2]]. Rule 2 disqualifications are easy to spot and non-controversial. There's no reason to wait for a ruling, as [[T:VS]] spells things out quite clearly. The only titles which spawn debate are those involving rule 4, but of course rule 4 inherently allows for such debates. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
Finally, {{tlx|notdwu}} is typically used for individual story pages, not articles about ranges. | Finally, {{tlx|notdwu}} is typically used for individual story pages, not articles about ranges. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150731042136-1827503/20150731064205-188432]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:43, 27 April 2023
Audio Visuals are disallowed because they all do indeed fail rule 2. Rule 2 disqualifications are easy to spot and non-controversial. There's no reason to wait for a ruling, as T:VS spells things out quite clearly. The only titles which spawn debate are those involving rule 4, but of course rule 4 inherently allows for such debates.
Once upon a time we maintained a list of things that were disallowed, but that became laborious, especially because people would sometimes say of things that were clearly invalid, "Well, you didn't specifically disallow it, so it must be okay."
By switching to a rules-with-examples-based system, we have greatly reduced the number of questions.
That said, it's a borderline case whether a {{notdwu}} tag is really necessary, and whether it would be confusing. There's a case for a {{real world}} tag, because the linked stories on the page are actually valid stories, and some readers might think we were saying those stories, like Cuddlesome, were invalid. Moreover, the article says within the first sentence that the AV stories were unlicensed, so the point of invalidity is immediately made.
Finally, {{notdwu}} is typically used for individual story pages, not articles about ranges.
