User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-24894325-20170523182705: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I was simply repeating the description of a "regular TV minisode" and noticing that minisodes appear so rarely nowadays that no pattern or rule can be devised about them. This was not an argument against validity. It was an argument against a particular way of determining validity that would make any minisode valid by default. | I was simply repeating the description of a "regular TV minisode" and noticing that minisodes appear so rarely nowadays that no pattern or rule can be devised about them. This was not an argument against validity. It was an argument against a particular way of determining validity that would make any minisode valid by default. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170416191252-2.26.183.189/20170523182705-24894325]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:50, 27 April 2023
I was simply repeating the description of a "regular TV minisode" and noticing that minisodes appear so rarely nowadays that no pattern or rule can be devised about them. This was not an argument against validity. It was an argument against a particular way of determining validity that would make any minisode valid by default.
