User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170423154116: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-4028641-20170423154116'''
So is anyone currently apposed to ''FftF'' being valid? More specifically, does anyone disagree with any of the recent points brought up?
So is anyone currently apposed to ''FftF'' being valid? More specifically, does anyone disagree with any of the recent points brought up?


Not trying to suggest anything, just trying to legitimately understand the current atmosphere of this debate.
Not trying to suggest anything, just trying to legitimately understand the current atmosphere of this debate.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170416191252-2.26.183.189/20170423154116-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:50, 27 April 2023

So is anyone currently apposed to FftF being valid? More specifically, does anyone disagree with any of the recent points brought up?

Not trying to suggest anything, just trying to legitimately understand the current atmosphere of this debate.