User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2249686-20200408180208: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2249686-20200408180208'''
{{retitle|Inclusion debates/Ace Returns and Jo Returns}}
I'd like to reopen these for discussion; mostly as the originals aren't readily available to read, but also I'd like to bring up the four rules as I understand them.
I'd like to reopen these for discussion; mostly as the originals aren't readily available to read, but also I'd like to bring up the four rules as I understand them.


Line 11: Line 11:
Unlike ''The Sixth Doctor is on Trial Again'' or ''The Home Assistants of Death'', these two stories aren't pastiches or tongue-in-cheek, and are clearly intended to feature Jo and Ace as they are in any other DWU stories. We can assume that the clips featured in ''Ace Returns!'' are meant to be flashbacks akin to the flashbacks seen in ''Death of the Doctor'' or ''Journey's End''.
Unlike ''The Sixth Doctor is on Trial Again'' or ''The Home Assistants of Death'', these two stories aren't pastiches or tongue-in-cheek, and are clearly intended to feature Jo and Ace as they are in any other DWU stories. We can assume that the clips featured in ''Ace Returns!'' are meant to be flashbacks akin to the flashbacks seen in ''Death of the Doctor'' or ''Journey's End''.


We should also take authorial intent into account; these were very explicitly intended to be part of the DWU, and the writer has gone on record to say as such.  {{retitle|///Ace Returns and Jo Returns}}
We should also take authorial intent into account; these were very explicitly intended to be part of the DWU, and the writer has gone on record to say as such.   
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200408180208-2249686]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:03, 27 April 2023

I'd like to reopen these for discussion; mostly as the originals aren't readily available to read, but also I'd like to bring up the four rules as I understand them.

1 - Only stories count. These are both stories. 2 - Commercial license. This was released by the BBC, who own all four characters featured. 3 - Official release. Both stories have been released in their entirety. 4 - Non-DWU Unlike The Sixth Doctor is on Trial Again or The Home Assistants of Death, these two stories aren't pastiches or tongue-in-cheek, and are clearly intended to feature Jo and Ace as they are in any other DWU stories. We can assume that the clips featured in Ace Returns! are meant to be flashbacks akin to the flashbacks seen in Death of the Doctor or Journey's End.

We should also take authorial intent into account; these were very explicitly intended to be part of the DWU, and the writer has gone on record to say as such.