User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-24894325-20170302225328/@comment-4028641-20170304062956: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I feel like it just comes down to us needing to have a debate on it. I've seen plenty instances of stories obviously being invalid, the tag can't be put on until there's a single bit of consensus. | I feel like it just comes down to us needing to have a debate on it. I've seen plenty instances of stories obviously being invalid, the tag can't be put on until there's a single bit of consensus. | ||
I have nothing to say against it being invalid. It seems pretty open-and-shut to me (in the sense that it's easy to figure out, not that the forum needs to be closed down). | I have nothing to say against it being invalid. It seems pretty open-and-shut to me (in the sense that it's easy to figure out, not that the forum needs to be closed down). | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170302225328-24894325/20170304062956-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:05, 27 April 2023
I feel like it just comes down to us needing to have a debate on it. I've seen plenty instances of stories obviously being invalid, the tag can't be put on until there's a single bit of consensus.
I have nothing to say against it being invalid. It seems pretty open-and-shut to me (in the sense that it's easy to figure out, not that the forum needs to be closed down).
