User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-25421326-20200308132630/@comment-27321963-20200506134403: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think the original post in this thread is extremely well put together, and I completely agree with the proposal. | I think the original post in this thread is extremely well put together, and I completely agree with the proposal. | ||
The main thing to take away here is "validity isn’t canonicity". If the entire reason that this story is invalid stems from the fact that the Seventh Doctor died before the TV movie, how can we then go on to consider work such as the recent 'Doctor Who and the Time War' short story valid? | The main thing to take away here is "validity isn’t canonicity". If the entire reason that this story is invalid stems from the fact that the Seventh Doctor died before the TV movie, how can we then go on to consider work such as the recent 'Doctor Who and the Time War' short story valid? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200308132630-25421326/20200506134403-27321963]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:07, 27 April 2023
I think the original post in this thread is extremely well put together, and I completely agree with the proposal.
The main thing to take away here is "validity isn’t canonicity". If the entire reason that this story is invalid stems from the fact that the Seventh Doctor died before the TV movie, how can we then go on to consider work such as the recent 'Doctor Who and the Time War' short story valid?
