User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-25421326-20200308132630/@comment-6032121-20200308140515: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I wholly support this proposal. I was the one who created [[Thread:240617]] a year ago, and I now see that I was going about it in completely the wrong way based on shaky precedents from the old Forums. What [[User:LilPotato]] has done is point out that shaky precedents from the old Forums is precisely what invalidated ''Death Comes to Time'' to begin with, and that we really should have run ''DCtT'' by the modern Four Little Rules long ago. The new evidence provided by ''[[At Childhood's End (novel)|At Childhood's End]]'' is just a cherry on the cake of something we were always going to have to do. | I wholly support this proposal. I was the one who created [[Thread:240617]] a year ago, and I now see that I was going about it in completely the wrong way based on shaky precedents from the old Forums. What [[User:LilPotato]] has done is point out that shaky precedents from the old Forums is precisely what invalidated ''Death Comes to Time'' to begin with, and that we really should have run ''DCtT'' by the modern Four Little Rules long ago. The new evidence provided by ''[[At Childhood's End (novel)|At Childhood's End]]'' is just a cherry on the cake of something we were always going to have to do. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200308132630-25421326/20200308140515-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:07, 27 April 2023
I wholly support this proposal. I was the one who created Thread:240617 a year ago, and I now see that I was going about it in completely the wrong way based on shaky precedents from the old Forums. What User:LilPotato has done is point out that shaky precedents from the old Forums is precisely what invalidated Death Comes to Time to begin with, and that we really should have run DCtT by the modern Four Little Rules long ago. The new evidence provided by At Childhood's End is just a cherry on the cake of something we were always going to have to do.
