User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27280472-20160323173732/@comment-1827503-20160324162330: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27280472-20160323173732/@comment-1827503-20160324162330'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Fwhiffahder wrote:
Fwhiffahder wrote:
Line 9: Line 8:
</div>
</div>
I tend to do that, but in this case the "fact" of the matter is that it passes our rules for valid sources.
I tend to do that, but in this case the "fact" of the matter is that it passes our rules for valid sources.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20160323173732-27280472/20160324162330-1827503]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:11, 27 April 2023

Fwhiffahder wrote:

Bwburke94 wrote: Valid unless specifically proven otherwise.

You're just stating your opinion as fact, yes?

I tend to do that, but in this case the "fact" of the matter is that it passes our rules for valid sources.