User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27280472-20160323173732/@comment-27280472-20160324164125: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Bwburke94 wrote: | Bwburke94 wrote: | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Yeah, it obviously passes the rules. As I understand it though, before anyone can actually write any articles, there has to be a drawn-out debate with CzechOut, whose unwillingness to consider a story a valid source appears to vary proportionally with how distant it is from televised Doctor Who. | Yeah, it obviously passes the rules. As I understand it though, before anyone can actually write any articles, there has to be a drawn-out debate with CzechOut, whose unwillingness to consider a story a valid source appears to vary proportionally with how distant it is from televised Doctor Who. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20160323173732-27280472/20160324164125-27280472]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:11, 27 April 2023
Bwburke94 wrote: it passes our rules for valid sources.
Yeah, it obviously passes the rules. As I understand it though, before anyone can actually write any articles, there has to be a drawn-out debate with CzechOut, whose unwillingness to consider a story a valid source appears to vary proportionally with how distant it is from televised Doctor Who.
