User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27343779-20160109192541/@comment-20607870-20160109200404: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't want to sound rude SOTO but when I and Ringoroadagain say non canon or canon we mean what you mean to be Invalid and Valid. I feel like what the BBC establish as non-canon is invalid and what's left is canon which is valid. I hope we don't fall out over this. But we mean no harm. | I don't want to sound rude SOTO but when I and Ringoroadagain say non canon or canon we mean what you mean to be Invalid and Valid. I feel like what the BBC establish as non-canon is invalid and what's left is canon which is valid. I hope we don't fall out over this. But we mean no harm. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20160109192541-27343779/20160109200404-20607870]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:16, 27 April 2023
I don't want to sound rude SOTO but when I and Ringoroadagain say non canon or canon we mean what you mean to be Invalid and Valid. I feel like what the BBC establish as non-canon is invalid and what's left is canon which is valid. I hope we don't fall out over this. But we mean no harm.
