User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-1783865-20191009190954: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-1783865-20191009190954'''
I just think it's totally ridiculous to cover the exact same story on a different page altogether. Nothing is different except for the cast who are also playing the same characters as the original 1965 cast. The Shada is a completely different matter mainly because the TV story is a Tom Baker story while the webcast is an animated Paul McGann story.
I just think it's totally ridiculous to cover the exact same story on a different page altogether. Nothing is different except for the cast who are also playing the same characters as the original 1965 cast. The Shada is a completely different matter mainly because the TV story is a Tom Baker story while the webcast is an animated Paul McGann story.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191009174707-28743561/20191009190954-1783865]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:24, 27 April 2023

I just think it's totally ridiculous to cover the exact same story on a different page altogether. Nothing is different except for the cast who are also playing the same characters as the original 1965 cast. The Shada is a completely different matter mainly because the TV story is a Tom Baker story while the webcast is an animated Paul McGann story.