User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-38288735-20191115183354: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-28743561-20191009174707/@comment-38288735-20191115183354'''
Yeah, that all makes sense to me.  For the record, I would draw the line pretty much right after this page.  While I would theoretically support separate pages for animations (based on having a separate "crew" from the original) if they were all complete stories, the fact that some of them are partial animations (due to only some of the episodes being missing) is the deciding factor for me.  I don't feel the need for separate pages for partial stories.  It's a pretty thin line, but that's where I'd draw it.
Yeah, that all makes sense to me.  For the record, I would draw the line pretty much right after this page.  While I would theoretically support separate pages for animations (based on having a separate "crew" from the original) if they were all complete stories, the fact that some of them are partial animations (due to only some of the episodes being missing) is the deciding factor for me.  I don't feel the need for separate pages for partial stories.  It's a pretty thin line, but that's where I'd draw it.


So, back on-topic, does anyone have any new arguments that have not been previously stated?
So, back on-topic, does anyone have any new arguments that have not been previously stated?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191009174707-28743561/20191115183354-38288735]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:25, 27 April 2023

Yeah, that all makes sense to me. For the record, I would draw the line pretty much right after this page. While I would theoretically support separate pages for animations (based on having a separate "crew" from the original) if they were all complete stories, the fact that some of them are partial animations (due to only some of the episodes being missing) is the deciding factor for me. I don't feel the need for separate pages for partial stories. It's a pretty thin line, but that's where I'd draw it.

So, back on-topic, does anyone have any new arguments that have not been previously stated?