User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-31010985-20191116032200: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-31010985-20191116032200'''
What? In no way was I trying to tell admins how to do their jobs. I was merely concerned that if the thread was still open to comments I would be technically violating [[T:BOUND]] even though a judgement had been given.  
What? In no way was I trying to tell admins how to do their jobs. I was merely concerned that if the thread was still open to comments I would be technically violating [[T:BOUND]] even though a judgement had been given.  


I'm not sure about any potential precedents of which you speak that could be set since it is my understanding that forum threads that don't contain any new evidence than that of previous threads are very quickly closed whereas this thread has given a bunch of new evidence.
I'm not sure about any potential precedents of which you speak that could be set since it is my understanding that forum threads that don't contain any new evidence than that of previous threads are very quickly closed whereas this thread has given a bunch of new evidence.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20191101112654-31010985/20191116032200-31010985]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:32, 27 April 2023

What? In no way was I trying to tell admins how to do their jobs. I was merely concerned that if the thread was still open to comments I would be technically violating T:BOUND even though a judgement had been given.

I'm not sure about any potential precedents of which you speak that could be set since it is my understanding that forum threads that don't contain any new evidence than that of previous threads are very quickly closed whereas this thread has given a bunch of new evidence.