User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-26975268-20130513164916: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
But what if there's no mention of the contrafibularity flu in the original novel? I think we should cover both, but, if anything contradicts, the original novel takes precedence. | But what if there's no mention of the contrafibularity flu in the original novel? I think we should cover both, but, if anything contradicts, the original novel takes precedence. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
I believe this is [[user:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]]'s stance as well. | I believe this is [[user:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]]'s stance as well. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20130510140359-37.225.52.51/20130513164916-26975268]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:35, 27 April 2023
But what if there's no mention of the contrafibularity flu in the original novel? I think we should cover both, but, if anything contradicts, the original novel takes precedence.
Hence, if both mention the flu, we only say that the Doctor caught it. If only the audio mentions the flu, then we say that Jason caught it.
I believe this is Tangerineduel's stance as well.
