User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510142845: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I mean [[Buried Treasures]], sorry. [[Gary Russell]] said it. I'll try to transcribe it later. Anyway, if the BBC does not own Bernice, the copyright situation is the same for both her and Vienna, so it should not be a surprise. Legally, for copyright reason, any spin-off that is not owned nor licensed by the BBC can officially claim to be a spin-off or to take place in the Doctor Who universe, whether it's Vienna, Bernice or K-9 the series. | I mean [[Buried Treasures]], sorry. [[Gary Russell]] said it. I'll try to transcribe it later. Anyway, if the BBC does not own Bernice, the copyright situation is the same for both her and Vienna, so it should not be a surprise. Legally, for copyright reason, any spin-off that is not owned nor licensed by the BBC can officially claim to be a spin-off or to take place in the Doctor Who universe, whether it's Vienna, Bernice or K-9 the series. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20130510140359-37.225.52.51/20130510142845-37.225.52.51]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:35, 27 April 2023
I mean Buried Treasures, sorry. Gary Russell said it. I'll try to transcribe it later. Anyway, if the BBC does not own Bernice, the copyright situation is the same for both her and Vienna, so it should not be a surprise. Legally, for copyright reason, any spin-off that is not owned nor licensed by the BBC can officially claim to be a spin-off or to take place in the Doctor Who universe, whether it's Vienna, Bernice or K-9 the series.
