User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1272640-20171119043147: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Shambala108 wrote: | Shambala108 wrote: | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
It is basically ''universally'' accepted that in video games, the gameplay doesn't count. Only the story does. You'd be hard-pressed to find a wiki with licensed games that doesn't have that policy. | It is basically ''universally'' accepted that in video games, the gameplay doesn't count. Only the story does. You'd be hard-pressed to find a wiki with licensed games that doesn't have that policy. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171119043147-1272640]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:38, 27 April 2023
Shambala108 wrote: Given that any "story" that doesn't have a consistent narrative among all users is considered not valid, it seems to me the easiest solution at this point is to make each video game not valid, and individual cases for inclusion could be argued at Board:Inclusion debates.
It is basically universally accepted that in video games, the gameplay doesn't count. Only the story does. You'd be hard-pressed to find a wiki with licensed games that doesn't have that policy.
