User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1432718-20170916231803: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
To give the above comment more context and detail, we on this wiki are not concerned with "canon". This is explained at [[Tardis:Canon policy]] and [[Canon]]. | To give the above comment more context and detail, we on this wiki are not concerned with "canon". This is explained at [[Tardis:Canon policy]] and [[Canon]]. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
It's important to be aware of these policies for this discussion. | It's important to be aware of these policies for this discussion. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20170916231803-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:38, 27 April 2023
To give the above comment more context and detail, we on this wiki are not concerned with "canon". This is explained at Tardis:Canon policy and Canon.
We are, however, concerned with what we call "validity". This applies to stories that we are allowed to use to write in universe articles. We have a set of guidelines to determine validity which can be found at Tardis:Valid sources.
And for the sake of this particular discussion, it is an established policy that any story that varies for different users, such as stage plays and many if not most video games, are not considered valid. I've already posted it above, but the reasoning for that policy is found at Forum:Why do prefixes link as they do?.
It's important to be aware of these policies for this discussion.
