User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1432718-20171119042822: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Given that any "story" that doesn't have a consistent narrative among all users is considered '''not valid''', it seems to me the easiest solution at this point is to make each video game '''not valid''', and individual cases for inclusion could be argued at [[Board:Inclusion debates]]. | Given that any "story" that doesn't have a consistent narrative among all users is considered '''not valid''', it seems to me the easiest solution at this point is to make each video game '''not valid''', and individual cases for inclusion could be argued at [[Board:Inclusion debates]]. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171119042822-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:38, 27 April 2023
Given that any "story" that doesn't have a consistent narrative among all users is considered not valid, it seems to me the easiest solution at this point is to make each video game not valid, and individual cases for inclusion could be argued at Board:Inclusion debates.
