User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1827503-20171125144641: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That is exactly what I wanted you to say. | That is exactly what I wanted you to say. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
And yet there's one thing that hasn't been considered in the past few posts: this isn't a ''Legacy'' thread! Shambala's proposal in #23 of this thread was to discuss each game separately, so we should leave ''Legacy'' be until we determine the status of the medium as a whole. | And yet there's one thing that hasn't been considered in the past few posts: this isn't a ''Legacy'' thread! Shambala's proposal in #23 of this thread was to discuss each game separately, so we should leave ''Legacy'' be until we determine the status of the medium as a whole. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171125144641-1827503]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:39, 27 April 2023
That is exactly what I wanted you to say.
If we conclude that the narrative of Legacy can be told without the gameplay, Legacy is a potential valid source. I say "potential" because we haven't proven its validity; we will only have disproven one of the many arguments against it.
And yet there's one thing that hasn't been considered in the past few posts: this isn't a Legacy thread! Shambala's proposal in #23 of this thread was to discuss each game separately, so we should leave Legacy be until we determine the status of the medium as a whole.
