User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4028641-20180116092358: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Frankly Shambala108, under the current conditions and standards of the inclusion debates I have to refuse your compromise. We haven't seen a thread closed in favour of validity in a very long time, (I believe the last case was the ''Dr. Men'' series) and any forum that moves even a step closer towards changing policy is left to rot. I'm not criticising past closings by any means, but until I see even a ''hint'' that a story being turned from ''invalid'' to ''valid'' is realistic with our current system I will not, by any means, support a "temporary" ''purge'' of content. | Frankly Shambala108, under the current conditions and standards of the inclusion debates I have to refuse your compromise. We haven't seen a thread closed in favour of validity in a very long time, (I believe the last case was the ''Dr. Men'' series) and any forum that moves even a step closer towards changing policy is left to rot. I'm not criticising past closings by any means, but until I see even a ''hint'' that a story being turned from ''invalid'' to ''valid'' is realistic with our current system I will not, by any means, support a "temporary" ''purge'' of content. | ||
Declaring that all videos games must now be invalid to be litigated over later is sentencing them to a slow, painful death. | Declaring that all videos games must now be invalid to be litigated over later is sentencing them to a slow, painful death. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20180116092358-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:39, 27 April 2023
Frankly Shambala108, under the current conditions and standards of the inclusion debates I have to refuse your compromise. We haven't seen a thread closed in favour of validity in a very long time, (I believe the last case was the Dr. Men series) and any forum that moves even a step closer towards changing policy is left to rot. I'm not criticising past closings by any means, but until I see even a hint that a story being turned from invalid to valid is realistic with our current system I will not, by any means, support a "temporary" purge of content.
Declaring that all videos games must now be invalid to be litigated over later is sentencing them to a slow, painful death.
