User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4189499-20171120091530: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4189499-20171120091530'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Bwburke94 wrote:
Bwburke94 wrote:
Line 5: Line 4:
</div>
</div>
I very much disagree with this statement. You can replace all gameplay in Legacy with "''<nowiki><blank></nowiki>'' appeared, fought, and the Doctors + his allies prevailed", and the story would make just as much sense.
I very much disagree with this statement. You can replace all gameplay in Legacy with "''<nowiki><blank></nowiki>'' appeared, fought, and the Doctors + his allies prevailed", and the story would make just as much sense.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171120091530-4189499]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 14:40, 27 April 2023

Bwburke94 wrote: If the narrative of Legacy were to be examined without its gameplay, it was determined there would be too many missing pieces to the plot for it to be considered a story.

I very much disagree with this statement. You can replace all gameplay in Legacy with "<blank> appeared, fought, and the Doctors + his allies prevailed", and the story would make just as much sense.