User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170308230046: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I want to point out that even if TLBM is seen as valid in the end, not all LEGO releases pass the first three rules. The ''Supergirl/ET'' crossover, from what I remember, is a lot like the in-character promos that we regularly deem unfit for our purposes. | I want to point out that even if TLBM is seen as valid in the end, not all LEGO releases pass the first three rules. The ''Supergirl/ET'' crossover, from what I remember, is a lot like the in-character promos that we regularly deem unfit for our purposes. | ||
I'm not even sure about the existence of ''[[The Dalek Extermination of Earth (TV story)]]''. I can find no source on this existing, but more importantly I'm not sure it passes rule 3. If it does exist, we don't have a copy of it. | I'm not even sure about the existence of ''[[The Dalek Extermination of Earth (TV story)]]''. I can find no source on this existing, but more importantly I'm not sure it passes rule 3. If it does exist, we don't have a copy of it. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170308230046-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:50, 27 April 2023
I want to point out that even if TLBM is seen as valid in the end, not all LEGO releases pass the first three rules. The Supergirl/ET crossover, from what I remember, is a lot like the in-character promos that we regularly deem unfit for our purposes.
I'm not even sure about the existence of The Dalek Extermination of Earth (TV story). I can find no source on this existing, but more importantly I'm not sure it passes rule 3. If it does exist, we don't have a copy of it.
