User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-1827503-20171210023618: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'd like to make an argument ''against'' the validity of TIDH. Namely, the nature of TIDH itself as a reprint of the original comics. | I'd like to make an argument ''against'' the validity of TIDH. Namely, the nature of TIDH itself as a reprint of the original comics. | ||
If TIDH were valid in its entirety, it would change twelve previously-invalid comics to valid. This means that those twelve comics would be validated by a connection to a ''later'' story, a state we have tended to avoid in the past. | If TIDH were valid in its entirety, it would change twelve previously-invalid comics to valid. This means that those twelve comics would be validated by a connection to a ''later'' story, a state we have tended to avoid in the past. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170322025232-4028641/20171210023618-1827503]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:10, 27 April 2023
I'd like to make an argument against the validity of TIDH. Namely, the nature of TIDH itself as a reprint of the original comics.
If TIDH were valid in its entirety, it would change twelve previously-invalid comics to valid. This means that those twelve comics would be validated by a connection to a later story, a state we have tended to avoid in the past.
