User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-1827503-20171210024558: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-1827503-20171210024558'''
My point is this:
My point is this:


Everything we've used retroactive validity for (unless I'm forgetting something?) has had a clear link to the DWU at release. The individual comics, in their original form, had no link to the DWU, so I see no way past the Rule #4 roadblock.
Everything we've used retroactive validity for (unless I'm forgetting something?) has had a clear link to the DWU at release. The individual comics, in their original form, had no link to the DWU, so I see no way past the Rule #4 roadblock.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170322025232-4028641/20171210024558-1827503]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:10, 27 April 2023

My point is this:

Everything we've used retroactive validity for (unless I'm forgetting something?) has had a clear link to the DWU at release. The individual comics, in their original form, had no link to the DWU, so I see no way past the Rule #4 roadblock.