User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-33695797-20180918033220: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
OttselSpy25 wrote: | OttselSpy25 wrote: | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
I didn’t mean we should use the details from those stories only on one page, but that it would be unnecessary to go into great detail on other pages. Doesn’t mean we couldn’t or shouldn’t. | I didn’t mean we should use the details from those stories only on one page, but that it would be unnecessary to go into great detail on other pages. Doesn’t mean we couldn’t or shouldn’t. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170322025232-4028641/20180918033220-33695797]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:11, 27 April 2023
OttselSpy25 wrote:
Chubby Potato wrote:
I think that would work. And we could cover the reprinted strips, but would never really need to use the details from that part of the story on other pages except the page for Death's Head.... No, we really couldn't. We have no policy in place for having pages be valid exclusively for certain pages. We can't say "This story is valid, but only for use on Death's Head."
I didn’t mean we should use the details from those stories only on one page, but that it would be unnecessary to go into great detail on other pages. Doesn’t mean we couldn’t or shouldn’t.
