User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-4028641-20171210072938: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Bwburke94 wrote: | Bwburke94 wrote: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
TO me, this would be like saying that ''Frankenstein''{{'}}s appearance in ''[[Doctor Who (1996)]]'' is to be ignored for not being created to be connected to the special. ''The Incomplete's Head'' is one complete story that, while being a comic, recycles "stock footage" to further tell that narrative. As far as I can see, if the linking segments are set in the ''DWU'', and if they are meant to be connected to ''Doctor Who'' in such a way that someone wanted us to find the connections present in the story, then we can't just cut around them (especially since the segments stop being named after issue 2). | TO me, this would be like saying that ''Frankenstein''{{'}}s appearance in ''[[Doctor Who (1996)]]'' is to be ignored for not being created to be connected to the special. ''The Incomplete's Head'' is one complete story that, while being a comic, recycles "stock footage" to further tell that narrative. As far as I can see, if the linking segments are set in the ''DWU'', and if they are meant to be connected to ''Doctor Who'' in such a way that someone wanted us to find the connections present in the story, then we can't just cut around them (especially since the segments stop being named after issue 2). | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170322025232-4028641/20171210072938-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:11, 27 April 2023
Bwburke94 wrote: Everything we've used retroactive validity for (unless I'm forgetting something?) has had a clear link to the DWU at release. The individual comics, in their original form, had no link to the DWU, so I see no way past the Rule #4 roadblock.
TO me, this would be like saying that Frankenstein's appearance in Doctor Who (1996) is to be ignored for not being created to be connected to the special. The Incomplete's Head is one complete story that, while being a comic, recycles "stock footage" to further tell that narrative. As far as I can see, if the linking segments are set in the DWU, and if they are meant to be connected to Doctor Who in such a way that someone wanted us to find the connections present in the story, then we can't just cut around them (especially since the segments stop being named after issue 2).
