User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-45692830-20200607203038: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Potato, I'll note that I did correct the idea that it was explicitly mentioned to be a Target novelization when it came up. At the time I was unaware of the BBC Books novelizations, search wasn't returning them, and they hadn't done anything in the NuWho era, so while I was checking the bottom NavBar I didn't go back that far. I still think they're unlikely for the reasons I mentioned. | Potato, I'll note that I did correct the idea that it was explicitly mentioned to be a Target novelization when it came up. At the time I was unaware of the BBC Books novelizations, search wasn't returning them, and they hadn't done anything in the NuWho era, so while I was checking the bottom NavBar I didn't go back that far. I still think they're unlikely for the reasons I mentioned. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200606025128-45314928/20200607203038-45692830]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:18, 27 April 2023
Potato, I'll note that I did correct the idea that it was explicitly mentioned to be a Target novelization when it came up. At the time I was unaware of the BBC Books novelizations, search wasn't returning them, and they hadn't done anything in the NuWho era, so while I was checking the bottom NavBar I didn't go back that far. I still think they're unlikely for the reasons I mentioned.
