User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725/@comment-1827503-20150731040543: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since the only one of our four rules up for grabs is #4, here's the text of the rule, more or less: | Since the only one of our four rules up for grabs is #4, here's the text of the rule, more or less: | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
So the question becomes, is there any "non-narrative evidence" that these backup stories are set outside the DWU? | So the question becomes, is there any "non-narrative evidence" that these backup stories are set outside the DWU? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150725190725-5545417/20150731040543-1827503]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:26, 27 April 2023
Since the only one of our four rules up for grabs is #4, here's the text of the rule, more or less:
"If a story was intended to be set outside the DWU, then it's probably not allowed. But a community discussion will likely be needed to make a final determination... Extraordinary non-narrative evidence must be presented to the community for a story to be kicked out based on Rule 4."
So the question becomes, is there any "non-narrative evidence" that these backup stories are set outside the DWU?
