User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-6032121-20190121193310/@comment-6032121-20190121201419: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-6032121-20190121193310/@comment-6032121-20190121201419'''
I get ''why'' you'd call it that; usual policy points towards it. But this isn't like, say, ''[[Legacy (video game)|Legacy]]'', which indeed shouldn't be titled ''Doctor Who'' legacy. "The Live Escape Game" isn't a title, it's a description of what this story called ''Doctor Who'' is, so that you don't confuse it with other things called ''Doctor Who''.  
I get ''why'' you'd call it that; usual policy points towards it. But this isn't like, say, ''[[Legacy (video game)|Legacy]]'', which indeed shouldn't be titled ''Doctor Who'' legacy. "The Live Escape Game" isn't a title, it's a description of what this story called ''Doctor Who'' is, so that you don't confuse it with other things called ''Doctor Who''.  


Line 5: Line 4:


This is a minor point, though, anyway. Any thoughts on the bigger issues I raise in the OP?
This is a minor point, though, anyway. Any thoughts on the bigger issues I raise in the OP?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190121193310-6032121/20190121201419-6032121]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:37, 27 April 2023

I get why you'd call it that; usual policy points towards it. But this isn't like, say, Legacy, which indeed shouldn't be titled Doctor Who legacy. "The Live Escape Game" isn't a title, it's a description of what this story called Doctor Who is, so that you don't confuse it with other things called Doctor Who.

It's like… take a theoretical video-game franchise, I dunno, Kingdom Hearts. They make a movie about it, marketed as Kingdom Hearts: The Movie. You may argue that its title is Kingdom Hearts: The Movie, rather than Kingdom Hearts. But it would be goddamn insane to act like its title is The Movie.

This is a minor point, though, anyway. Any thoughts on the bigger issues I raise in the OP?