User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-6032121-20190121193310/@comment-6032121-20190121203942: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
SOTO wrote: | SOTO wrote: | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
But if it wasn't clear yet, of SOTO's three options, I support #3, would be okay with #2, and find #1 a real disservice to ''Worlds Collide'' and to escape-games in general as a medium. | But if it wasn't clear yet, of SOTO's three options, I support #3, would be okay with #2, and find #1 a real disservice to ''Worlds Collide'' and to escape-games in general as a medium. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190121193310-6032121/20190121203942-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:37, 27 April 2023
SOTO wrote: But I should note there is a rename tag there right now, and a comic story adaptation to potentially conflict with.
Yeah — indeed, you'll find me on that thing's talk page arguing for its dabbing. In its case, there's also the fact that sooner or later we will most likely get another, very-possibly valid theatrical film out of Doctor Who, so we might as well create the dab term now — an argument which applies less to Worlds Collide, as I don't know how likely another escape-game is. Though who knows, really, if this one proves successful.
But if it wasn't clear yet, of SOTO's three options, I support #3, would be okay with #2, and find #1 a real disservice to Worlds Collide and to escape-games in general as a medium.
