User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-95.145.155.227-20171125234745/@comment-31010985-20180101193902: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
86.152.200.4 wrote: | 86.152.200.4 wrote: | ||
Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
I look forward to an admin making a ruling on the anthology, hopefully sometime in the near future! | I look forward to an admin making a ruling on the anthology, hopefully sometime in the near future! | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20171125234745-95.145.155.227/20180101193902-31010985]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 15:40, 27 April 2023
86.152.200.4 wrote: I'd say that he was joking.
Do you have a source for that? He spoke to The Fan Show as if she were alive. It might have been something of a joke in 2008 on set but RTD has now made it happen. This sort of situation can be likened to Steven Moffat jokingly stating that Nardole has invisible hair - something which made it onto screen in Twice Upon a Time! At the end of the day RTD's statements about the canonicity of the poem can be put down to him caring about his character and wanting to clarify that she had a happy story in the end. His interview for Radio Times also backs this up, he also echoes the story about Phil Collinson:
Absolutely. She's my character, that's my episode. I say that's true.
I look forward to an admin making a ruling on the anthology, hopefully sometime in the near future!