User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Tales from the Tardis/@comment-188432-20130325173913/@comment-5442547-20130415202707: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Tales from the Tardis/@comment-188432-20130325173913/@comment-5442547-20130415202707'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
CzechOut wrote:
CzechOut wrote:
Line 5: Line 4:
</div>
</div>
Almost no one agrees that it should be thrown out...I don't know where you got that they do from.
Almost no one agrees that it should be thrown out...I don't know where you got that they do from.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Tales from the Tardis/20130325173913-188432/20130415202707-5442547]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:52, 27 April 2023

CzechOut wrote: But anyway the point is that we all agree that there is doubt, introduced by the key creatives, as to whether Vienna is in the DWU. Everyone in this discussion agrees to that. Consensus is actually to throw Vienna out, because everyone says that one reading of the statements given is that Vienna is not a spin-off of DW. We disagree only about the level of ambiguity of that statement, not about whether that is a plausible reading.

Almost no one agrees that it should be thrown out...I don't know where you got that they do from.