User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Drax Cave/@comment-188432-20130108231223/@comment-3030984-20130114103336: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Drax Cave/@comment-188432-20130108231223/@comment-3030984-20130114103336'''
I have used multiple contrast checkers that conform to various W3 standards - [http://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/ here], [http://www.colorsontheweb.com/colorcontrast.asp here] and [http://snook.ca/technical/colour_contrast/colour.html here].
I have used multiple contrast checkers that conform to various W3 standards - [http://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/ here], [http://www.colorsontheweb.com/colorcontrast.asp here] and [http://snook.ca/technical/colour_contrast/colour.html here].


Line 7: Line 6:


While I love the darker background, I just don't think it is going to work contrast-wise.
While I love the darker background, I just don't think it is going to work contrast-wise.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Drax Cave/20130108231223-188432/20130114103336-3030984]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 18:35, 27 April 2023

I have used multiple contrast checkers that conform to various W3 standards - here, here and here.

Why does this matter to me? Because considering this is a wiki, it would be nice to be able to be able to see links to other pages. At the moment, all I see is light text on a dark background. There just is not enough contrast for me to tell the difference between links and normal text without manually hovering my cursor over every word.

I consider my eyesight to be quite good, and I have calibrated my monitor enough times to know that it isn't a problem at my end.

While I love the darker background, I just don't think it is going to work contrast-wise.