User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-121.45.54.78-20130925110520/@comment-38288735-20191120162843: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hm. I interpreted it as the Solitract taking her form, but your interpretation doesn't raise red flags for me going from memory. | Hm. I interpreted it as the Solitract taking her form, but your interpretation doesn't raise red flags for me going from memory. | ||
Regardless of the individual case, would you say that, if it were clear that it were the Solitract and not Grace, that it should not be counted as an appearance of Grace? Any policy is going to have borderline cases requiring discussion (as this very well may be), but would you say that the concept behind that policy proposal is sound? The overall policy is really the point of this thread. | Regardless of the individual case, would you say that, if it were clear that it were the Solitract and not Grace, that it should not be counted as an appearance of Grace? Any policy is going to have borderline cases requiring discussion (as this very well may be), but would you say that the concept behind that policy proposal is sound? The overall policy is really the point of this thread. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130925110520-121.45.54.78/20191120162843-38288735]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:05, 27 April 2023
Hm. I interpreted it as the Solitract taking her form, but your interpretation doesn't raise red flags for me going from memory.
Regardless of the individual case, would you say that, if it were clear that it were the Solitract and not Grace, that it should not be counted as an appearance of Grace? Any policy is going to have borderline cases requiring discussion (as this very well may be), but would you say that the concept behind that policy proposal is sound? The overall policy is really the point of this thread.
