229,566
edits
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5/-, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|The Panopticon/Infobox Naming: Mothers and Fathers}} | |||
I'm not quite sure if this is the right place to ask or not (though at the top it does say, "Don't understand why we do things as we do? Notice the same problem across several pages?"), but why are fathers the only parents that get to have their full names recognized in the infoboxes? Spouses, in-laws, and children get full names but mothers' last names are always cut off, regardless of whether or not they have a different last name than the child and/or the child's father (which really shouldn't matter anyway, as women are just as entitled to be recognized by our full names as men). | I'm not quite sure if this is the right place to ask or not (though at the top it does say, "Don't understand why we do things as we do? Notice the same problem across several pages?"), but why are fathers the only parents that get to have their full names recognized in the infoboxes? Spouses, in-laws, and children get full names but mothers' last names are always cut off, regardless of whether or not they have a different last name than the child and/or the child's father (which really shouldn't matter anyway, as women are just as entitled to be recognized by our full names as men). | ||
Is this some kind of infobox glitch and is there any way to fix it? | Is this some kind of infobox glitch and is there any way to fix it? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20140308080255-1293767]]</noinclude> |