User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-24894325-20161209220542: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What does "leads directly" exactly mean? Almost every serial of the classic series leads directly into the next serial, but we do not consider them one story. ''The Parting of the Ways'' leads directly into ''The Christmas Invasion'' by way of regeneration. Should we consider two-parters with no common Doctor among them? | What does "leads directly" exactly mean? Almost every serial of the classic series leads directly into the next serial, but we do not consider them one story. ''The Parting of the Ways'' leads directly into ''The Christmas Invasion'' by way of regeneration. Should we consider two-parters with no common Doctor among them? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151029072618-1293767/20161209220542-24894325]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:28, 27 April 2023
What does "leads directly" exactly mean? Almost every serial of the classic series leads directly into the next serial, but we do not consider them one story. The Parting of the Ways leads directly into The Christmas Invasion by way of regeneration. Should we consider two-parters with no common Doctor among them?
