User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-26469787-20151029092958: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
OttselSpy25 wrote: | OttselSpy25 wrote: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
In the BBC Wales series? No. The only argument that could be made here are the stories of Series 9, but we already seem to have a consensus amongst articles that the two "linked pairs" of the series are separate stories. | In the BBC Wales series? No. The only argument that could be made here are the stories of Series 9, but we already seem to have a consensus amongst articles that the two "linked pairs" of the series are separate stories. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151029072618-1293767/20151029092958-26469787]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:29, 27 April 2023
OttselSpy25 wrote: Now three of qualifiers is a lot more sane of a concept, for it does (basically) sort out any troubles that we have with "is it tho" story sets. To check it tho, have there been any two or more parters where different parts were written by different people?
In the BBC Wales series? No. The only argument that could be made here are the stories of Series 9, but we already seem to have a consensus amongst articles that the two "linked pairs" of the series are separate stories.
