User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-4028641-20151122211146: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm also very confused about how that not-discussion from the days of old is enough to create a policy but this discussion featuring near three times as many contributors and ''actual evidence and debate'' does not? | I'm also very confused about how that not-discussion from the days of old is enough to create a policy but this discussion featuring near three times as many contributors and ''actual evidence and debate'' does not? | ||
I guess to make this policy we just need to start stating it as ''fact'' in other forums until people forget that it ''definitely isn't policy'' and it becomes policy. | I guess to make this policy we just need to start stating it as ''fact'' in other forums until people forget that it ''definitely isn't policy'' and it becomes policy. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151029072618-1293767/20151122211146-4028641]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 20:33, 27 April 2023
I'm also very confused about how that not-discussion from the days of old is enough to create a policy but this discussion featuring near three times as many contributors and actual evidence and debate does not?
I guess to make this policy we just need to start stating it as fact in other forums until people forget that it definitely isn't policy and it becomes policy.