User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-4028641-20151122211146: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-4028641-20151122211146'''
I'm also very confused about how that not-discussion from the days of old is enough to create a policy but this discussion featuring near three times as many contributors and ''actual evidence and debate'' does not?
I'm also very confused about how that not-discussion from the days of old is enough to create a policy but this discussion featuring near three times as many contributors and ''actual evidence and debate'' does not?


I guess to make this policy we just need to start stating it as ''fact'' in other forums until people forget that it ''definitely isn't policy'' and it becomes policy.
I guess to make this policy we just need to start stating it as ''fact'' in other forums until people forget that it ''definitely isn't policy'' and it becomes policy.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151029072618-1293767/20151122211146-4028641]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 20:33, 27 April 2023

I'm also very confused about how that not-discussion from the days of old is enough to create a policy but this discussion featuring near three times as many contributors and actual evidence and debate does not?

I guess to make this policy we just need to start stating it as fact in other forums until people forget that it definitely isn't policy and it becomes policy.