User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20130203002409/@comment-26975268-20130523221206: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
CzechOut wrote: | CzechOut wrote: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
* [[Sarah Jane Adventures series 1]] | * [[Sarah Jane Adventures series 1]] | ||
with the abbreviations as redirects? Then again, we do abbreviate magazines when we name issues... | with the abbreviations as redirects? Then again, we do abbreviate magazines when we name issues... | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130203002409-1317169/20130523221206-26975268]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:54, 27 April 2023
CzechOut wrote: Yeah I think for TW and SJA, we'd just do Series 1 (Torchwood) (home media), except of course this points up an obvious flaw in our series nomenclature. We might need to do a move to a new nomenclature like DW series 1 and TW series 1 and SJA series 1, to then allow for TW series 1 (home media). However, this would just be a simple move to a "formal" new name. We'd obviously keep the old nomenclature as a redirect so that we could still pipe trick the name of the series away.
Why would we use TW instead of Torchwood and DW instead of Doctor Who? Shouldn't it be:
with the abbreviations as redirects? Then again, we do abbreviate magazines when we name issues...
