User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-27321963-20200329212628: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I didn't realise that this was being discussed. | I didn't realise that this was being discussed. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
I would also be in agreement to removing the Dream Lord, he was just a physical manifestation - not an incarnation of its own, it would be like having the Ganger Doctor on the list. | I would also be in agreement to removing the Dream Lord, he was just a physical manifestation - not an incarnation of its own, it would be like having the Ganger Doctor on the list. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200302103744-1783865/20200329212628-27321963]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:17, 27 April 2023
I didn't realise that this was being discussed.
I definitely think that the Timeless Child, the Fugitive and Morbius Doctors should go on the infobox (with the upmost urgency). I don't think the "More" bit in the other-selves section looks appealing, and it leads to a category which includes the more ambiguous incarnations. Can the "More Ambiguous" title not be linked to the category itself rather than have the need for "More"?
I would also be in agreement to removing the Dream Lord, he was just a physical manifestation - not an incarnation of its own, it would be like having the Ganger Doctor on the list.
