User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-27321963-20200331013314: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-27321963-20200331013314'''
I think we pass that bridge when we get there, but right now the Timeless Children and the Morbius Doctors should be treated exactly the same in my opinion. I would still personally but them both in the unplaced section rather than the ambiguous one, as they were shown in a montage with all the other confirmed Doctors.
I think we pass that bridge when we get there, but right now the Timeless Children and the Morbius Doctors should be treated exactly the same in my opinion. I would still personally but them both in the unplaced section rather than the ambiguous one, as they were shown in a montage with all the other confirmed Doctors.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200302103744-1783865/20200331013314-27321963]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:17, 27 April 2023

I think we pass that bridge when we get there, but right now the Timeless Children and the Morbius Doctors should be treated exactly the same in my opinion. I would still personally but them both in the unplaced section rather than the ambiguous one, as they were shown in a montage with all the other confirmed Doctors.