User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-44988386-20200707190525: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Najawin wrote: | Najawin wrote: | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Yes, I've read it. But the thing is, it doesn't apply to the Navboxes, because that's not what they're for. Quite honestly, if the issue is cluttering, then why is this one the navbox that is taken issue with, as opposed to the numerous navboxes created during the lifespan of this wiki? | Yes, I've read it. But the thing is, it doesn't apply to the Navboxes, because that's not what they're for. Quite honestly, if the issue is cluttering, then why is this one the navbox that is taken issue with, as opposed to the numerous navboxes created during the lifespan of this wiki? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200302103744-1783865/20200707190525-44988386]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:18, 27 April 2023
Najawin wrote: The navboxes aren't. But the wiki is to some extent based around narratives (see: rule 1 of Tardis:Valid sources).
Yes, I've read it. But the thing is, it doesn't apply to the Navboxes, because that's not what they're for. Quite honestly, if the issue is cluttering, then why is this one the navbox that is taken issue with, as opposed to the numerous navboxes created during the lifespan of this wiki?
