User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-45135034-20200428200218: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-45135034-20200428200218'''
Ordering "Other Selves and Unplaced Incarnations"by appearance order is a good idea as that would eliminate a lot of pointless debates. The same should probably be done for "More Ambiguous".
Ordering "Other Selves and Unplaced Incarnations"by appearance order is a good idea as that would eliminate a lot of pointless debates. The same should probably be done for "More Ambiguous".


As for the second option, I wonder of having four categories might be a bit excessive? If not then I would say that "Early Lives" should go under "Widely Accepted". The core Doctors should always be first, imo.
As for the second option, I wonder of having four categories might be a bit excessive? If not then I would say that "Early Lives" should go under "Widely Accepted". The core Doctors should always be first, imo.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200302103744-1783865/20200428200218-45135034]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:19, 27 April 2023

Ordering "Other Selves and Unplaced Incarnations"by appearance order is a good idea as that would eliminate a lot of pointless debates. The same should probably be done for "More Ambiguous".

As for the second option, I wonder of having four categories might be a bit excessive? If not then I would say that "Early Lives" should go under "Widely Accepted". The core Doctors should always be first, imo.