User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-6032121-20200305121213: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wrong. As you can see at [[The Doctor (The Brain of Morbius)]], several accounts of pre-Hartnell Doctors show the Second Doctor (or beyond!) as knowing perfectly well that these regenerations existed, so it doesn't fit into the Timeless Child framework. As with turtles — it's alternative accounts all the way down, my friend. | Wrong. As you can see at [[The Doctor (The Brain of Morbius)]], several accounts of pre-Hartnell Doctors show the Second Doctor (or beyond!) as knowing perfectly well that these regenerations existed, so it doesn't fit into the Timeless Child framework. As with turtles — it's alternative accounts all the way down, my friend. | ||
(And please [[T:CANON|avoid the term "canon"]]. ''The Brain of Morbius'' was always ''valid'', and beyond that simple fact, we do not concern ourselves with building a self-consistent "canon".) | (And please [[T:CANON|avoid the term "canon"]]. ''The Brain of Morbius'' was always ''valid'', and beyond that simple fact, we do not concern ourselves with building a self-consistent "canon".) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200302103744-1783865/20200305121213-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:20, 27 April 2023
Wrong. As you can see at The Doctor (The Brain of Morbius), several accounts of pre-Hartnell Doctors show the Second Doctor (or beyond!) as knowing perfectly well that these regenerations existed, so it doesn't fit into the Timeless Child framework. As with turtles — it's alternative accounts all the way down, my friend.
(And please avoid the term "canon". The Brain of Morbius was always valid, and beyond that simple fact, we do not concern ourselves with building a self-consistent "canon".)
