User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-6032121-20200307230536: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Furthermore, maybe a legal quibble, but the Timeless Child pre-mindwipe had infinite lives, infinite regenerations. Does this count as a "regeneration cycle" ''per se''? If not, then the 12-shot regeneration cycle that begins with Hartnell and was clearly failing with Smith is the Doctor's first regeneration ''cycle'' as such even if some of the pre-Hartnell Timeless Children already called themselves the Doctor. | Furthermore, maybe a legal quibble, but the Timeless Child pre-mindwipe had infinite lives, infinite regenerations. Does this count as a "regeneration cycle" ''per se''? If not, then the 12-shot regeneration cycle that begins with Hartnell and was clearly failing with Smith is the Doctor's first regeneration ''cycle'' as such even if some of the pre-Hartnell Timeless Children already called themselves the Doctor. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200302103744-1783865/20200307230536-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:20, 27 April 2023
Furthermore, maybe a legal quibble, but the Timeless Child pre-mindwipe had infinite lives, infinite regenerations. Does this count as a "regeneration cycle" per se? If not, then the 12-shot regeneration cycle that begins with Hartnell and was clearly failing with Smith is the Doctor's first regeneration cycle as such even if some of the pre-Hartnell Timeless Children already called themselves the Doctor.
