User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-6032121-20200330230734: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''[[Scream of the Shalka (webcast)|Scream of the Shalka]]'' is most specifically not considered a [[Tardis:Valid sources|valid source]] by this Wiki at present. If new evidence is found, we could reopen that debate, but the last discussion on the matter found that although he was treated as an official incarnation by the BBC during ''production'' (and to a lesser extent advertising campaign), they already knew by the time they ''released'' it that the Shalka Doc would no longer "count". | ''[[Scream of the Shalka (webcast)|Scream of the Shalka]]'' is most specifically not considered a [[Tardis:Valid sources|valid source]] by this Wiki at present. If new evidence is found, we could reopen that debate, but the last discussion on the matter found that although he was treated as an official incarnation by the BBC during ''production'' (and to a lesser extent advertising campaign), they already knew by the time they ''released'' it that the Shalka Doc would no longer "count". | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200302103744-1783865/20200330230734-6032121]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 21:20, 27 April 2023
Scream of the Shalka is most specifically not considered a valid source by this Wiki at present. If new evidence is found, we could reopen that debate, but the last discussion on the matter found that although he was treated as an official incarnation by the BBC during production (and to a lesser extent advertising campaign), they already knew by the time they released it that the Shalka Doc would no longer "count".