User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20121207092215/@comment-3030984-20121207115550: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Regardless of it's background/origin, I like the name 'TARDIS Index File'. It shows originality in the naming of the wiki. Compare to [[memoryalpha:Portal:Main|Memory Alpha]] (which ironically in this case, ''is'' named after [[memoryalpha:Memory Alpha|something in-universe]]). | Regardless of it's background/origin, I like the name 'TARDIS Index File'. It shows originality in the naming of the wiki. Compare to [[memoryalpha:Portal:Main|Memory Alpha]] (which ironically in this case, ''is'' named after [[memoryalpha:Memory Alpha|something in-universe]]). | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
On a separate note, what about the international versions? What are they called at the moment? | On a separate note, what about the international versions? What are they called at the moment? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121207092215-188432/20121207115550-3030984]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:31, 27 April 2023
Regardless of it's background/origin, I like the name 'TARDIS Index File'. It shows originality in the naming of the wiki. Compare to Memory Alpha (which ironically in this case, is named after something in-universe).
Calling the wiki 'TARDIS Wiki' makes little sense in my opinion. Is it a wiki about TARDISes? If one were to change the title to include 'wiki', it would in my opinion need to be 'Doctor Who Wiki' - which is rather boring and generic.
On a separate note, what about the international versions? What are they called at the moment?
